US Patents have been first to file since 2013. If the claimed invention was in the public domain before filing, then it shouldn't have been allowed and is not a valid patent. At this point, that would become an issue if the patent owner ever tried to enforce it.
Keep an open mind, but don't let your brain fall out.
@ScottS said:
US Patents have been first to file since 2013. If the claimed invention was in the public domain before filing, then it shouldn't have been allowed and is not a valid patent. At this point, that would become an issue if the patent owner ever tried to enforce it.
You are correct. I should have stopped at prior art.
Comments
That's curious, looks exactly like MLTLs as descibed by Ausgpurger 60 years ago. What's the novel improvement that warranted a patent?
This looks like a port at the end of a transmission line… this post was dated 2013-03-13 diyAudio Forum
Which makes this (I believe) public disclosure / public use
https://patents.google.com/patent/US11917361B2/en?oq=11,917,361+
This application was filed: 2021-08-12
Not like there’s a USPTO rule; 2001 Duty of Disclosure, Candor, and Good Faith [R-08.2017] or anything… Oh, snap.
I’m sure it all passed muster as a novel improvement
It's an MLTL, called something else. Marketing patent development.
InDIYana Event Website
'Better sound through marketing'... think this strategy has been borrowed from another consumer electronics co... ha
US Patents have been first to file since 2013. If the claimed invention was in the public domain before filing, then it shouldn't have been allowed and is not a valid patent. At this point, that would become an issue if the patent owner ever tried to enforce it.
Sehlin Sound Solutions
You are correct. I should have stopped at prior art.